Hey, guys Max the day we’re going to take a look at the new 2019 mac pro, and we’re going to see how it performs in article editing now I have to say that this thing is an absolute beast the build quality is fantastic I love the design.

It is incredibly silent shockingly silent, and even the case that it comes in the box with like 30 pounds for the sporty pound machine I need apple did a great job now it is also incredibly expensive not saying.

It’s not worth it to a particular group of people I think it is. Still, there’s a lot of other options that we’re going to see for a different article, so today I’m going to focus on final cut pro because I think a lot of people are going to buy.

The system for a final cut that’s a mac OS exclusive, of course, some of you guys are going to use premiere or damage result, but I want to get this first video out there as soon as I can I know you guys are excited you guys want to see how it does and my full in-depth test.

We’re going to look at the pictures all premiere pro and final cut a lot of different codecs and make some comparisons that are going to be out shortly in the future that does take multiple days of testing in the shooting and editing so make sure.

You guys are subscribed because don’t miss out on that video but I have a lot of great info for you guys now we also did a video taken a look at the thermal performance and a ton of different benchmarks 3 D.

Animation graphics performance some gaming type stuff that’s over on the Max said channel I’ll leave a link down in the description that there are some exciting things in a couple of ways. The system stands out apart from like other workstation computers, so let’s jump right in and talk about the configuration here.

I already did a video on what configs I recommend for most people you guys can check that out, but I have the 12 core model at 3.3 gigahertz.

This has 48 gigabytes of ram in this house read the radio pro Vega 2 graphics card with 32 gigabytes of HBM 2 memory, and that’s what’s going to be very important for video editing now. I also have the afterburner card in the system that’s going to able decoding.

This is weird. I’ve never seen this not be maxed out, so for the first time, 4 K. 60 C. 200 rod is not the limitation is the income. The order that took 5 minutes for a 5-minute project in comparison. I’m not pro takes closer to 8 minutes.

So that is a pretty significant improvement but not just that alone the CBN graphics are maxed out the where the I mac pro is maxing out in its limit at that speed this has way more overhead. Suppose you want to do multi-cam if you’re going to affect more animations harder stuff more. I’ll still do 5 minutes because right now, the limiter is the encoder.

.
We’re just taking it one to one that is good news for those guys who work with the Sportage if you’re exporting a 20-minute doc, you know you might be able to ship it in 10 to 15 minutes. Suppose it’s 24 or 30 frames per second not bad at all, so we’ll take a look at that a little bit more in my full detailed article and now seek a look at red rock.

This is 4.5 Kate playing it back perfectly smoothly CPUs at 76 percent right now 58 drops down the jeep you kicked up to help out now so bounce that out 25 percent on the graphics no issues what so ever and now I do want to say once again that Apple is going to release and dreads new metal API.

So it’s going to use less of the Cebu more the graphics, but even without that display, just fine let’s go ahead and export this okay, we have 3 minutes and 40 seconds 4 of 5 minutes project 4.5 K. run exporting higher than 4 K.

Almost twice as fast as the iMac pro not bad at all, it will be even faster because of the crazy graphics card in the system.

I guess we should test out some programs rock, so let me get my hard drive. It will plug it in here. We have 4 K. 120 frames per second prover as raw from the FS 5 mark to recorded to an Atomos inferno.

This is slow down here you guys see the slow-motion this is what the color grading with corrections applied I have a lot of pride in my CPU is at 2 percent that I mean this.

Not doing anything other than running mac OS because it doesn’t go below that I think it all that’s because. The afterburner card in the system is doing all of this processing our graphics card is only at 8 percent, and that is because it all has to do is take the color correction.

The lot that’s applied and just added to the footage once that’s done no issues whatsoever here.

Let’s let’s go. Like us with that is a price rise already pretty easy our system with the final cut but I don’t know if I’ve seen it this good.

Let’s explore 5 minutes of this program as raw footage out to plans for 22, so we’re halfway through. Their vendor here in RCB’s win only running about 55 percent in our graphics are their only running about 2025 percent stop a minute and 45 seconds for 5 minutes of progress rock color corrected lead applied not too bad not bad at all.

It’s going to take out our afterburner card and see how much the afterburner card helped the system okay, so that took me about a minute and 30 seconds no longer think of ever removing something from a computer with no tools.

Whatsoever that fast, here’s the afterburner card. This is worth $2000. Let’s set it down carefully right over here. Start playing this back the same project now at the Cebu has about 21 percent using the graphics card is still about the same took off 20 percent of C. P.

Usage running this and everything was processed here instead of a not went up slightly let’s try to go back and forth super smooth still, I mean it has no issues.

This is why I was saying in my configuration guide that hold off from buying the afterburner card one, make sure we tested out because the CD is already so dominant in the system. Programs rise so efficiently with the final cut you might not need.

If you might have enough horsepower even with the 12 core possibly even eight courts, just leave the twelfth okay so the renders about halfway are done here.

We’re ready almost on a minute 45 seconds, so the afterburner cart is helping it took 2 minutes, and 52 seconds that is fascinating interesting.

So I guess I’ll have to do a lot more testing on the afterburner card different plea back enough to for. Fines of 8 K. ProRes raw footage if you guys have some, please let me know in the comments section.

That way, I can test it out with that and give you guys a better verdict on if it’s worth it or if it’s not, so that is it guys let me know your thoughts down in the comments section below.

What they got to point out is that this thing was completely silent the whole time I literally cannot hear it unless my ears like an inch away, and even then, it’s so subtle quiet it is shocking.

We pushed it in our other article Max if you sell it to the limits, we Max out the CPU and the GPU at the same time for an extended period.

I’ll just let you watch that video at the link below, so thanks again to the micro center for making.

This content possible to make sure you guys click above right over there to see more videos on the mac pro, including testing different graphics cards.

We can add yourself to see if it’s worth paying for that pricey workstation graphics card the radion Vega too that’s inside of here thanks for watching some backs, and I’ll see you in the next article.

Hey guys, this Max in this article we’re going to be comparing the color science of Sony mirrorless cameras compared to Fujimori list cameras. Now I want to do this test a little bit different I don’t want to tell you which one.

I think it is best because everybody has their own biases. You guys were following along. I love the Fuji cameras. I love them, but I do most of my work with Sony mirrorless cameras.

Please get a piece of paper a note pad your phone or whatever you want to use it right down for shot one do you like it would be better for a shot to a or B. all the way to shot ten and then let me know which one scored how many be completely honest I want to see your opinion without knowing.

The Fuji is shooting at 200 megabits per second instead of 100. Personally, this is a hard one. Maybe somewhere in the middle would be good I guess this only looks more true to life I think I could say that the food.

You look more finished if you want to see that even though they both have six exaggerations and contrast jumping into the third shot here, I preferred the so many.

It does have a little bit a green cast to my eye there was a lot of foliage and a lot of harsh sunlight, so you’re getting reflections of green where’s the food kind of tone that down.

The song is a bit more punch as far as the saturation, and the skin is a bit brighter, so I like that, so if I were choosing between the 2 for this one, I would choose the Sony and go to R. for the last shot with standard picture profiles here.

I prefer the Fuji the Sony looks more true to life because we had a lot of reflections from the foliage, so you have this kind of like a tent on her face.

Where is the food you feel it almost gets rid of that the skin to look so pleasing it does look a little flat and I notice that threat the shots where?

The way pulls down the highlights gets rid of some of the shadowings in the face where is Sony maintains that more and I like that about Sony, but you have that kind of color cast.

This is without a doubt I would choose the Fuji film now. Let’s jump into our custom profile, so we have an attorney here and have a picture profile 6 with Sony with this foliage, of course.

We have more green in the Sony even though the food you has a bit more saturation in the background, and I like the Sony better jumping into the second scene here.

Where we have kind of the river here, I also prefer Sony just a bit more pops in the green, and here we have a that was the end of my daughters here.

It’s hard to say I like the shadowing in the face and how it’s handling the highlights and maintaining some of those highly details better on the Sony wears a Fuji looks kind of flat I would have to see the Fuji film I would choose the Fuji here. It’s the shot here with either one yeah a lot of tents in this in the Sony from the reflections and the food you eat.

That part of it is missing I would give the colors to the Fuji once again this is a that turn a profile and then moving on to our next test this one I would choose. Sony, we don’t have as many reflections in the future if the face expressionless highlights and looking at his shirt, I mean.

I know the color of the shirt, and it looks the way it does with the Sony, and I prefer that one, but we have you in here swinging around I guess it is the same result.

I prefer the Fuji full overall I like the way the Sony deals with I guess exposure and highlights, but I like the color of the Fuji film better.

Guys, so there we have a Fuji versus so many color size comparison. I am very excited to hear your guy’s opinions on which one you chose more often and which you would prefer and why. If you haven’t commented yet, please comment below if you enjoy this article give it a thumbs up I was about half and a half for scenery.

I like the Sony for skin tones in a lot of cases I read some of the examples I guess I should say for the Sony in other cases, especially where. We had the harsh sunlight bouncing off the grass bouncing off the foliage just the tent in the face on the Sony was too much and surprisingly.

Somehow in both profiles, Fuji just got rid of that. It’s almost like this some smart something smart I guess smart color science behind it knows hate that is not normal get rid of that, so that is impressive.

If you’re shooting those situations of man, the Fuji looks excellent. I do wish the exposure in kind of the way it deals with the mid-tones and highlights was a little different. I prefer Sony, especially in the picture profile six, much better. Still, with Sony, it is more accurate in some cases.

You will have to spend more time getting rid of some of those tents in some cases, especially using auto white balance to get rid of magenta and other cases getting rid of green whereas with the Fuji film not to worry.

Not that they got it covered. They kind of figure it out if you just want to shoot and not spend time color grading.

This guy is great. Of course, it only has the name of Grange improvements over the Fujifilm has some other benefits but out of the box if we’re just looking at color science.

The Fuji has it going on, so there we have guys thank you for watching once again check out sound stripe, yeah if you guys need some music, it is so affordable.

You can use it unlimited for anything you want. They have a ton of great songs, and I would highly recommend you check out the link down in the description below. This is Max, and I’ll see you guys in the next article.

His Max in this article we are going to be comparing the brand new 2000 198 core MacBook pros with an external graphics card attached using 1 of these radio sevens or another graphics card the Vega 64 against the branding also a core.

IMAX has bigger 48 graphics now a lot of you guys like always want to know if you can use the MacBook Pro as a replacement for an I mac you have the portability when you’re on the go and then in this case you can attach an eGPU.

When you’re sitting at your desk and get better performance instead of being tied down to a regular I’m back in for some other guys have been asking, can you just go to the base 560 X.

Graphics and some of the most significant 1 TV and then just attach something much more powerful.

When you’re at your desk, that is a question that will be answered in this video, and I’ll be completely upfront with you guys for most of it is not worth buying.

An EGP, you’re much better off buying the Vega 20 graphics internally if you need an excellent graphics performance.

If you need good about 6 per format, that will not be a good alternative you know buying a GPU with a MacBook pro compared to buying.

An I mac that I make is a better choice. I’ll explain precisely why and the few cases where an eGPU could be beneficial.

If you have a MacBook Pro, you guys have been on me asking about an update to the previous article made on this topic, which was about a year ago, and I kept putting that article off because I was waiting for final cut updates.

I was waiting for mac OS updates better support overall with all these programs, and we have had some improvements in mapquest just added.

Official support for this graphics cards was a perfect time in windows this card performs fantastic for this type of usage it gets about 2015 0 a score for OpenCL, unfortunately in mac OS.

Even though we have official support, the scores are not that great, and it’s very close to the Vega 64, which is close to half the price of this guy right.

Here and I did at some video editing tests initially, and the results were identical with the Vega 64 as you guys can see, so that is a massive bomber.

I’m going to have to wait more and do a follow-up video, but I still wanted to get this comparison, Alex.

I gave the numbers from the Vega 64 for this. If you guys are trying to buy something right now, you want something.

That’s going to be the best bang for the Buck that is still the best bang for the Buck, so let’s jump into the numbers here we’re going to start with stabilizing a 20 second 4 K.

Clip-in premiere pro there is no difference because it’s mainly CPU bound, but we do get a good improvement in final intervention resolved.

It’s still not as fast as the I mac, which has a slower bigger 48 graphics. I was hoping for some better results starting, especially with the test that is GPU bound.

I was hoping for some prudence from a year ago, but we are still not there yet now I think this is for video editing thing a part of it is because of the way the video editing accesses.

The external graphics but a part of it is still optimizations with the systems we’ll get a benchmark occasion heaven, which is a gaming benchmark we seem much better improvements over the Vega 20, especially for use.

An external display that gives you the best results would have to send data back through the same Venable cable to your CPU to be processed but even here.

Where we get the best results in the best gains, which is kind of gaming, we still get very similar effects of the Vega 64 compared to the bigger 40 internally now that is also because.

When we’re using this external graphics card, we only get a 4 X. PCIe lane from the C. B. I don’t get too technical here, but you don’t have the same speed connecting a graphics externally.

As you do, having it be inside of your system because it has to go through the animal controller through the cable to the graphics card to be processed and is more bandwidth limited, and We’re going to start to see this more.

We start comparing the real-world video editing results, so let’s jump into that more we’re going to. Take a look at a standard 4 K.

Project here with two let’s inform green a plight, and what we see here may shock you, especially if your final cut user says he considers both. Then I back in the regular MacBook pro’s most significant 20 are very close in speeds with final cut and adding on this piece of a graphics card externally, adding all the extra steps.

It needs just makes a lot more bottleneck here actually, and we’re not maxing out their graphics card.

All it’s not being used maybe like 25 percent, but our result is quite a bit slower now in premiere pro individuals. However, it does seem we do see a little bit of improvement not very much, but it’s there thankfully it’s not making it slower.

But still, if we compare the results to the I mac with the worst graphics card inside, you know those bees are quite a bit faster.

I know some of you guys hear me asking what about the timeline performance to playback when you’re editing that matters more, and yes, that is right.

I’ll be touching on that more in just a second right after a thank you to our sponsors Squarespace I’ve been recommending square space for over four years.

Now and that’s not only because of how insanely simple quick and easy it is to set up a gorgeous looking website with all of their templates and not only because you have automatic versions for all mobile devices.

It’s also because of the upkeep I’m the process of switching over my main and article work website over to Squarespace, and that’s because of the maintenance.

It ought to worry about plugin stopping working doing updates code getting messed up and stuff like that everything just works, and on top of that, security certifications are included in the price.

So are the domains if you go for the yearly package not just makes it so easy like I said not only to set it up no matter if you want to perform the website if you wish to E. commerce if you’re going to block any of that stuff.

You have no headaches along the way, which is fantastic when you’re trying to do work and now focus on keeping your website up, so going to use the link below to get 10 percent off, there’s also a free trial with no credit card required.

So if you’ve been thinking about updating a website for switching over go and give him a shot, I would highly recommend it for you guys get entirely discouraged.

I want to say I do have some positive news about EGP use coming up the first we have some more take it if someone I show you guys each I. 265 right here similar project different Kodak.

As you can see, the results are practically the same eGPU doesn’t do much and actually can slow.

It down now in this case that Iraq is slower and final cut into the venture is all that is because it does not have a T. 2 chip, which will include the video much faster. These computers are high, and they handle this footage great, but unfortunately.

Sometimes when you’re adding eGPU, you have a little bit of glitching or stuttering in the timeline. Now it’s not all the time, but you do notice if you’re used to working natively with the graphics card.

Then you add on the GPU now at this point you might be thinking well it’s not worth getting a single graphics card overall you might be right, but there are some cases where the eGPU will help out with your MacBook pro.

Editing and that is when you get into the heavier codex the stuff they’re going to push your CPU to the Max that are driving your graphics card to the Max E. that is heating your system.

Let’s jump into canon C. 200 raw footage in here when we’re exporting a 5-minute project we get faster results with a final cut in with premiere pro Davinci resolve did get slower, which is odd. I am using results 16 the latest beta, which has the best support for external graphics cards, showed off an A. B.

The final cut got a pretty good improvement and not only for vendors but actually in the timeline as well. This MacBook pro can only handle 30 frames per second raw footage from the C.

200, but when we add on any GPU, we get up to 50 frames per second, so that is almost double the performance, and when you’re in the timeline, that does make a huge difference, and it’s going to help you.

Out here in the latest version of premiere pro, it did give us some improvements but not by a considerable margin, which is quite odd because a graphics card is being pushed well into adventures all that stayed about the same as a bit glitchy.

That is another significant improvement, but for everybody else, it is not worth getting an E. G. P. U. even with the Vega 20 a weaker graphics set up with the MacBook pro a lot of times, you’re getting better performance or so very similar performance.

And you’re also getting smoother timeline performance without any weird little stutters are glitches, so thank you guys for watching.

If you have any questions, ask in the comments section below, do my best to answer them, and I want to do a more in-depth article on this maybe tested a few different graphics cards go into windows and stat.

I don’t know, give me some ideas down below because I have hope for better results than what we see here this when Max and I’ll see you in the next article.

Hey, guys Max the day we’re going to take a look at the new 2019 mac pro and see how it performs in video editing now, I have to say that this thing is an absolute beast. The build quality is fantastic.

I love the design. It is incredibly silent, shockingly silent, and even the case that it comes in the box with like 30 pounds for the sporty pound machine.

I need apple to do a great job now. It is also incredibly expensive, not saying it’s worth it to a particular group of people.

I think it is, but there’s a lot of other options that we’re going to see for a different article so today. Going to focus on final cut pro because I think a lot of people will buy the system for a final cut that’s a mac OS exclusive, of course.

Some of you guys are going to use premiere or damage results, but I want to get this initial article out there as soon as possible. I know you guys are excited.

You guys want to see how it does and my full in-depth test we’re going to look at the pictures all premiere pro and final cut a lot of different codecs and make some comparisons.

That’s going to be out shortly in the future that does take multiple days of testing in the shooting and editing, so make sure you guys are subscribed because don’t miss out on that article.

I have a lot of great info for you guys now we also did a video taken a look at the thermal performance and a ton of different benchmarks 3 D.

Animation graphics performance some gaming type stuff that’s over on the Max said channel I’ll leave a link down in the description there are some exciting things in a couple of ways that. The system stands out apart from like other workstation computers, so let’s jump right in and talk about the configuration here.

I already did a video on what configs I recommend for most people you guys can check that out, but I have the 12 core model at 3.3 gigahertz.

This has 48 gigabytes of ram in this house read the radio pro Vega 2 graphics card with 32 gigabytes of HBM 2 memory, and that’s what’s going to be very important for video editing now I also have the afterburner card in the system that’s going to able decoding of.

Programs and programs Russell we’re going to put that to the test today as well that’s the option that I don’t know how much people need to spend if you work a lot person maybe, but we shall see and the 1 test I don’t want to run for you guys a black magic rock crew is the black magic recipe.

Test here we could see right away we’re running EKG decoding it out 114 frames per second and that’s getting close about four streams of Multicam 8 K., and if we take a look at 4 K., We have 400 and 59 frames per second, so that’s close to 20 streams of 4 K.

Multi camp black magic rock I want to give you guys a reference point of performance for the system even though I don’t want to get into benchmarks as far as CPU performance.

This thing is getting about 50 to 55 percent more CPU performance then R. I. mac pro, which has an eight-core the CPU clock speed, is also running higher, which is excellent and as far as graphics in geekbench fives metal square.

This type of simple video but now it’s good to see these new graphics cards you’re no longer slower at exporting even if you could edit faster now let’s do a similar test with H. I. 265 HEVC this will use the T. 2 chip that’s inside the system and just as I expected.

The time is the same as the iMac pro because they’re both using the same T. 2 chip, and the rest of the components have no issues with this footage. Now let’s jump into its head bit H. D. is playing this back.

There are no issues whatsoever everything’s perfectly smooth I have a couple of lots here were still at 4 percent CPU 8 percent GPU not back to 2 percent CPU no issues at all whatsoever.

But the issue that people are having is when you’re trying to export this because with the previous machines, there’s no acceleration for the exporting has.

To be CPU only took forever the new graphics card in the new MacBook pros 60-inch ones in this system have a 10 bit it colder I don’t know if I look at is using it yet it might still be software so let’s take a look all right, so that’s 35 minutes.

Which is a long time for a 5-minute project that is not an issue with the system at all it’s an issue with a final cut at the I’m not project X. 45 minutes so we do see some improvement there but this system it was even using half of the C. P. U.

Ultimately we need for Apple to release a version 15 of the final cut for HDR HEVC 10 bit exporting with the graphics card because a project like this should take somewhere between 2 to 3 minutes to ship now let’s get into with the harder tougher stuff here.

I have 4 K. 60 frames per second footage from the canon C. 200 this is raw footage some corrections applied I have a lot of play here as I expected and as it should for this amount of money.

It is playing back perfectly smoothly the graphics card is running at 67 percent the CPUs running at 27 percent, so no issues whatsoever playing this back on other system say like. The mac pro would Max out the graphics card if you add more corrections in a fax in titles in this you will get.

Some choppiness some stuttering it’s Max out at 60 FPS was here you should be able to do multi-cam 2430 FPS C. 200 Rossi 3 streams of it exciting, so we’re exporting this, and I’m used to seeing the CPU the graphics card be maxed out with this footage in here.

We’ll take a look at that a little bit more in my full detailed video and now seek a look at red rock this is 4.5 Kate playing it back perfectly smoothly CPUs at 76 percent right now 58 drops down the jeep you kicked up to help out now so bounce that out 25 percent on the graphics no issues what so ever.

Now I do want to say once again that Apple will release and dread new metal API, so it’s going to use less of the Cebu more than the graphics, but even without that display, that is just fine. Let’s go ahead export this okay we have 3 minutes and 40 seconds 4 of 5 minutes project 4.5 K.

Run exporting higher than 4 K. almost twice as fast as the iMac pro not bad at all it will be even faster because of the crazy graphics card in the system I guess we should test out some programs rock so let me get my hard drive it will plug it in here we have a 4 K.

One hundred twenty frames per second prover as raw from the FS 5 mark to recorded to an Atomos inferno this is slow down here you guys see the slow-motion this is what the color grading with corrections applied I have a lot of pride in my CPU is at 2 percent that I mean this.

Not doing anything at all other than running mac OS because it doesn’t go below that I think it all that’s because the afterburner card in the system is doing all of this processing our graphics card is only at 8 percent.

It all has to do is take the color correction and the lot that’s applied and just added to the footage once that’s done no issues whatsoever here let’s go.

We tested out because the CD is already so dominant in the system, and programs rise so efficiently with the final cut you might not need. You might have enough horsepower even with the 12 core, possibly even eight courts, which also leaves.

The twelfth okay, so the renders about halfway were done here, and we’re ready almost on a minute 45 seconds. The afterburner cart is helping it took 2 minutes, and 52 seconds that is fascinating interesting. Hence, I guess I’ll have to do a lot more testing on the afterburner card different plea back enough to for.

Fines of 8 K. ProRes raw footage if you guys have some, please let me know in the comments section that way I can test it out with that and to give you guys a better verdict on if it’s worth it or if it’s not, so that is it, guys.

Let me know your thoughts down in the comments section below what they got to point out: this thing was completely silent the whole time. I literally cannot hear it unless my ears like an inch away, and even then, it’s so subtle quiet it is shocking.

We pushed it in our other article Max if you sell it to the limits, we Max out the CPU and the GPU at the same time for an extended period.

I’ll just let you watch that article at the link is down below, so thanks again to the micro center for making this content possible make sure.

You guys click above right over there to see more videos on the mac pro, including testing different graphics cards.

We can add yourself to see if it’s worth paying for that pricey workstation graphics card the radion Vega too that’s inside of here thanks for watching some backs, and I’ll see you in the next article.

Hey, is this Max today we’re going to be comparing the brand new road in Aston C. to 1 of my favorite Gimbels the crane to when the ronin S.

Launch most people loved it, but they have the same feedback, but it was too heavy for single-handed use, especially.

When you put on you know a decent size body in a lens on it the DJ I fix that problem made some other improvements with the S. C. to be completely honest with you guys I was a bit under one then it seems like a lot of the other reviewers were as well maybe they didn’t want to mention.

It because I sent them out the gamble this 1 I purchased myself, so I kind of look at the specs, and I thought that looks very similar to my cream to as far as weight.

But the camera’s capacity is quite a bit smaller, so it’s limiting that’s why I want to do the shoot out. Let’s go ahead and compare them now.

One thing that I love about the cream to is the Manfrotto plates meaning I can take my camera off of my tripod my monopod slip it on here and be ready to go and vice versa, whereas with the new run in a seat.

Because they wanted to lower that weight, made everything smaller, including this little plate right here, they also made a couple of other changes, so there’s actually.

This little moveable locking out here that is awesome, so if you’re using the same ones in the camera, you can preset it in actually just slip it in to get.

The perfect position and then this accessory here you no longer just a here yeah I should do it on this arm. I’m using 1 of my favorite combos here, the 73 with a 28 to 75 to hear mine, and a lot of people are using. This is one thing that I love that they added to this gamble is the axis locks.

I can focus on getting this one balanced there you go. We are poised in. Unfortunately, even though I adjust that about 40 millimeters instead of a typical 50, they give me a good middle ground between 20 to 75. I still am hating that rear little eye peas cover let me see. If I can take this thing off of that will help okay now we’re clearing it, I think if I. I bounce it out 50, we might be touching or very close so.

I think this is going to be the biggest downside with the ronin S. C., but you do not have with the crane 3 with this bad boy I can’t even balance a C. 200 on it all right let’s turn this sucker on flashing was not working I guess I have to activate it first I’m going to go and connect to that no.

I don’t want to buy your replacement plan. That is one thing that I love about the crane Gimbels compared to most other brands you can grab this out of the box. It just works. You don’t have to go in and tweak the settings you can, but out of the box, you get smooth results, and we even have a built-in display, so I got to pull my phone up.

I have to you know to switch the power settings if I ever have your camera or tweak some things no that’s set up was a bit of a pain but honestly.

This is good for people who are just getting a new gamble to teach them that the toilets balance it and run this test, so finally we’re ready to go I’m in mode one now, let’s check it out.

And we are just really lagging here. Sleepover motile. And that’s part. I can pan, but I can’t do any told. And mo 3. Okay. This is a little too fast.

So I guess I have to go in the settings and make a custom mode out of the box like I said I like the crane mode it’s right in between mode one and mode.

But this guy way too quick so I’m going to do that, and then we’ll get some shots. So there you have it my first footage with the ronin S. C. and personally.

I was a little underwhelmed throw those clips. I kept going back into the app maybe 56 times tweaking the settings trying to get it you know to work correctly for my shooting style, and even still, I feel like those a little bit of a janitor.

I got to give a big shout out to the sponsor of this video audible visit audible.com slash Max Y. or text Max why to 500 500 to start your free 30-day trial and get a free audiobook audible is the leader in audiobooks with basically.

Anything that you would want to listen to I’ve been paying for audible for a couple of years now and changed my life like many of you it’s hard for me to find time to read but be able to listen to audiobooks.

When I’m commuting while I’m doing chores around the house and even while working is fantastic, I would highly recommend for everybody to listen to books as your reviews crush it. Now is the time to cash in on your passion for looking at that and other great audiobooks.

Finally, I shifted my mind and allowed me to become a full-time filmmaker who is 1 of the best decisions that I ever made for a limited time.

Time prime members can start an audible membership and save 66 percent off your first three months. $30 off start listening with a 30-day Audible trial, and your first audiobook plus two audible originals are free to visit audible.com slash Max white where tax Max why to 1000.

Do you guys have a side by side comparison between the ronin S. C. and the crane 2 I want to hear guys opinions?

Let me know which one looks smoother once again the crane to had no adjustments whatsoever I think it kind of helps out a little bit of a deadpan change for especially for like the running shots.

Whereas this guy I spent about 20 minutes tweaking, I feel like I can get a little better if I fine-tune a little more, but overall, I have to say that I am very impressed with the ronin S. C. when I pull the thing out of the box.

Just getting near my hands around it and feeling and feeling how it’s built, it feels good on another level compared to the crane to which is also good. It’s all-metal, but I love this group. I love the way.

It shaped, and it fits my hand perfectly compared to their own us which was a little bit too big even for my large hands and if you have smaller medium hands that was probably crazy for you guys a few things I stood out to me about the ronin S. see you first off right when.

I got it out of the box. It feels nice to build quality of the materials that are used along with just the feel in the hand I love that they made to groups smaller the ronin S. was too large even for my large hands.

It was too big. This fits utterly. I also love that we have these locks now. It makes it much easier to balance. I also really like that the grip is the touch just like the ronin S. this is so handy if you want to pack it down, make it small, and put in a backpack in your suitcase your messenger bag.

Whatever you cannot do that with the crane to anything is quite a bit larger. They made some changes to the case not only is it small fragile much more than there with the crane to in pretty much every other gamble once actually set up the chance I never use the box it came with because you could not do.

This is rated for close to 5 pounds. This one is calculated at 7 pounds, but that doesn’t matter because what the Rohingya Nessie there is not enough clearance right over here the 28 to 75.

Tamron lens, which is relatively light weights, can barely be balanced with the ronin S. C. and if you want to bounce 70 millimeters, you’re maxing this thing out, and even then, you have to remove your makeup, and you might still be touching at the back here.

So I wish they just extended this arm by half-inch or so maybe an inch. Still, even a half-inch would make a big difference and now instead of the weight of their own, and that’s being kind of the downside with the S. seat it’s the fact that you can’t balance have your lenses even with small bodies now the cream to that is not an issue.

Whatsoever and like I showed you guys at the start, I even bounce a C. 200 on here with like a cannon 51.2 lands, and I guess you with that you know pretty much all day you can handle.

The weight so you want to shoot with a canon or Sony 24 to 70 F. 2.8 or like 851.4 prime lenses or even a Fuji X. E. 3 with a 16 to 552.8 you will not be able to do so with this gamble and that’s the most significant limitation for people are starting our people.

Using prime lenses, it is beautiful I like the size of like how could be very compact you could throw it into any bag, but as you’re going along as you’re upgrading your lenses, you want to use some of the higher end more delicate glass.

This will hold you back, so that is the most significant differentiating par anything between these 2 I don’t care as much about you know the batteries were said the fact that this doesn’t lock.

The screen we were you’re holding the screen to the office I just live you can see the full screen it just fine it’s going to be that payload so if you can only have one gamble personally.

I was to just go for the crane to you. You can get it for less price if you want the focusing motor to throw anything you want.

On there and they will handle it where this guy needs to be contacted, you need to break down if you’re using lighter cameras and lenses I would say go for the ronin S.

Seat let me know if you got any questions down in the comments section below I’m going to be testing this out using it at a few weddings and I’ll be doing a long term review.

Hey guys, it’s Max I just got a box in the mail that I’ve been waiting for for a while now, of course, you know what that is it’s the Tamron 17 to 20 F. 2.8 lens.

We’re going to be taking a look at it testing it out and comparing it directly against the Sony 6 seems to 35 A. G. master lens. This might be my favorite G.

Muscles out of all of them, I was super impressed at the launch event. I do have a full review that you guys can go and check out super sharp, nice ones.

But there’s just one thing that is wrong with it, and it’s not mistaken it’s just kind of sucks, and that is the price tag this thing is 2000 $200 so even more expensive than my A. 73 of course.

If you have the money it is an excellent land, but this is where it Tamron is stepping in once again given us a good value option 17 to 28 not as versatile range, but it’s $900 is a 20 200 you can buy 2 of these now instead of 1 of these issues all right. Okay.

With vehicles, I don’t see it feels like a toy because that’s an insult. The build quality is the same as in 2875. The materials look to be the same. It seems better than it’s unusual for 20 to 25. There’s a little line.

When the plastic was molded this doesn’t have that so looks like they could have improved that of course that still has the same layout, so the zoom is at the top in focus is closer to the body that was the downside of this Tamron, but I did get used to it didn’t have any issues, but I’m surprised by how lightweight.

It is I wanted to make this video a little bit differently more interesting, so I’m not just sitting in my office. I’m out here in my backyard. With that said, Sir, if you have some, you know barking so, Winona is a FedEx truck driving by or something like that work some hot spots here, but the first thing I want to look at is sharpness.

My shadow over there, I’m going to take a series of photos both center in the corner. We’ll see how these compare in terms of sharpness 2875 is very sharp, so I expect the 17 to 28 to be very good now before we get into that there’s one thing I want to mention: how tight these lands attach is I just put it on before recording. I almost have to like force it to get it, and it feels like I have to push a little too hard.

I don’t have that with my other Tamron with the G. master, and with this 1 I don’t know, maybe I’ll wear it after a while, but with native Sony lenses, you don’t get the issue.

Let’s take some shots taking a look at the full shots it is incredible how similar they look just a little bit of a white balance temperature shift in free going to a center crop out 400 percent they are so close even on a 5 K.

Display I would say the Sony might be just a hair sharper. Still, if we stopped on a 56 now the Taman looks just slightly brighter and looking at the extreme corners here, I think the Sony is only ever so slightly sharper he stopped down at 5.6 now at the Taman is taking the lead and going into 28 millimeters now.

Center crop here at 5.6 is close I think that’s how much is very slightly sharper corners here at 2.8. I would give it to Sony, but when he stopped on a 5.6 just somewhat brighter with the Tamron, so just like.

The Sony you do have the punch anything going to manual focus you should have I had a discussion as well the one thing you don’t get is manual focus switch on the side. Which I like in the customizable button this is just a simple design now another difference is this zooms internally the Tamron does so.

If you’re throwing it on a gamble, it’s not going to throw off your balance will barely change when your job adjusting your zeal whereas a 16 of 35 as you guys can see.

It extends not a lot, but a lot of glass is right up here at the front, which will throw off some of the balance in the front. Both of these are 2.aids but because this is 1635 the X.

The range makes it much larger we have an 82 mil filter on the front compared to just 67 millimeters, which matches up precisely to the 2875 and a couple of other ones that house.

That is very convenient, so that all right. Hey. This little guy came out to join me your face is all dirty, let’s go and test out the autofocusing system.
Both in sales and video advertising isn’t that important in so once that is so wide compared to say like a portrait lens a lot of things you’re not doing much action anything like.

But let’s see if we have any differences to Taman was much lower. It took 18 seconds to make 20 consecutive photos using a single autofocusing point compared to just 12 seconds on the Sony. It was noticeable when I was taking pictures.

I also tested article, and I found something that I was not expecting both were very smooth and had proper motion, and they were silent, but the Sony has much more focus shifting, so the focal in changes when it’s focusing.

Where’s the Tamron has almost none more like a single lens you guys may have noticed some of the Boca in a few of these tests let’s take a closer look at that you compare the Boca I shot a 28 millimeters F. 2.8 in they are very close to Sony as well let’s move there it’s a little bit cleaner here so.

It is better, but this is a much closer comparison than the 2875 Tamron to the G. master 24 to 70 so good job Tamron the sun just picked out once again.

This is the perfect time to test out flaring now. This is an issue that many people have when they’re shooting wide because of how susceptible these curves from Elland elements are in different coatings will improve and reduce flaring that’s 1 area where I think the G.

Master will be quite a way ahead of the less expensive tam on, but let’s take a look now this is something that I was not expecting if we looked at the Tamron overall.

It has better contrast. The flaring is more controlled. It’s a little more extreme in the corners with different colors, but the Stoney has a lot going on towards the center. There lie circles of different colors.

The Tama just has that one little hot spot, and in this shot one or not shooting directly into the sun, the Tamron is pretty much perfectly clean. What is the Sony does have a Cup?

Full marks over there in lower contrast as well, so this was surprising. I’m guessing that’s because the Sony is more full has a more prominent front element, but those salmon does win here.

I’m not sure if you ever wanted me to be this close to the camera, but now we are going to test out minimal focusing distances just if you’re going to choose a macro or close the macro with your wedding len.

You guys can see the Tehran can get quite a bit closer than Sony for macro photos both on the long and the 28 millimeters, and on the wide end at 17, this is another area where the team on 28 to 75 does better than the G.

Master, so the last question that you guys probably have that, unfortunately.
I can’t answer for you I can’t even answer for myself at least until my full review comes out is the 17 millimeters on the Tamron wide enough compared to the 16 so here you guys will see some shots side by side and this is like the worst time to shoot for some real things up just at my house here but just to show.

You guys an example of the difference in this kind of scenario where you know the rooms are big enough. I think that the 17 millimeters are just beautiful, even for like a smaller kitchen in the bathrooms. You probably would want something more comprehensive and another thing to consider.

If you’re doing videos, not photos, but if you’re doing videos in a shooting with the camera like the A. 7 3001.2 times crop if the shooting 4030 and that will be affected now, these shots were 4024, but for a lot of stuff.

I want to go to 4030 gets me the results, and there’s a 70 millimeter that might be a little bit more limiting; ignoring my kids around in that room over there, I’m not as far as dollar thing on again will have the ronin S. C.

I was able to balance the G. master 16 or 35. I am maxing out the plate and moving back to restore it, and unfortunately, with that, we are touching the I. cap, whereas the Taman 17 to 28 nothing is.

Well, a lightweight, there’s no issues at all so far as weight wise I’d instead go with the Tamron incise but, of course, is giving you a bit wider of a shot now I will be doing a review of this lands.

I hope to do a couple of real estate jobs she got some of those examples in getting some actual world usage out of it before I give you a full review so make sure he is a subscriber notification enabled.

If you guys want to check out that article, for some people, this is just going to be the no-brainer because of the price tag, even if it’s not as good in specific categories.

I’m not on the longer end the 28 millimeters I don’t mind that this goes to 35 sure it’s beautiful, but I would much rather take the trade office size and weight and lose a little bit on the long end.

Hey guys, it’s Max today we are going to be taking a look at the future in my future. I mean something futuristic but available right now we’re going to playback full resolution 8 K.

Redraw files, and we’re not going to do on a low computer costs over $4000 I can barely play it back we are going to be doing so on this system.

I see right here, fan analytes laptop. This is one of Nvidia’s new RTX studio laptops in this article made in partnership with them, so thank you to Nvidia. I’ll show you exactly how something so thin so light and super portable can full playback resolution 8 K. red rock no I’ve always been a massive fan of laptops.

You could be productive on the say you’re traveling or even if you want to get out of the office and do some work at sea a coffee shop do some work outside and get some sunlight or also. I hate that it is a joke, but there have been a few times.

I was on some strict deadlines, and I just had to get the job done, so whatever you’re doing, it’s nice to be able to have portability. Still, there’s always been one downside with laptops, and that has been the graphics performance starting with the first laptop that I bought for video editing going all the way up to the latest and greatest fully spec’d out MacBook pros.

The limitation is the graphics. That’s what’s holding back the whole system well; now we have some compelling graphics options in Nvidia working together with the laptop manufacturers to make sure that everything is running smoothly and you get the best performance so all of these studio laptops.

Nvidia certifies them for video editing for graphic design if you’re doing 3 D. modeling a bunch of different creative tasks but not only the hardware also the drivers with Nvidia studio drivers in front of me. I have the M. S. I. P. 75 creator 9 S. F. laptop.

It has an accurate color Matt displayed. It has a core I. 98 core processor 32 gigabytes of ram a one terabyte envy I mean assist detained, of course, an Nvidia RTX 2070 Max Q. graphics card. So what is Nvidia studio certified, and we are going to be not only testing this out playing back 4 K.

Raw, but we are also going to be comparing it to a fully spec’d out MacBook Pro, which comes in at a little over $1000 more expensive.

If you’re going to be like this, what kind of video is it without some comparisons as I mentioned these laptops of the same processors. And they also the same amount of ram in instead of H. R. 20, you see the scores are relatively similar. The MSI does score higher because of its better thermals.

But now I want to go ahead and test out geek bench for just for the graphics themselves and see what kind of a performance difference we can X.

The fact all right our tests are running. I’m using the OpenCL test because the MacBook can do metal in them aside with envy. You guys have the technology.

We’re going just to keep it at a level playing field all righty there, okay. So this is why a MacBook owners and mac lovers 1 Nvidia in their systems what 2070 here the Max Q. design.

We have a 220 2000 OpenCL score compared to 70 9000 975 now. I’m not fantastic at math, but that sounds to triple the performance with the 2070 Max Q.

MS I has a model of this with a 4 K. display and with 2080 as well so you can get even better graphics card and the MacBook this is the best that we can get and if you saw my previous article. The most significant limitation of what this MacBook Pro is the graphics card now finally let’s get into the red 8 K.

Playback and editing so here in front of me I’ve resin that acts open this is Reds program you could do a ton of stuff in it. They worked with Nvidia to enable the awesome power of these graphics cards to be fully utilized with this Kodak and make a massive difference in performance.

Let’s start with my MacBook pro here as a baseline mega-hit plays all right we are buffering we get a few frames as you could tell this is stuttering like crazy. We’re maxing out the system, and we are not getting anywhere, and it looks like we got ourselves a solid 4.5 frames per second instead of 25.

Now one thing that we could do is drop down 4 K. playback and as you can see we get a few more frames but that same issue where glitching up and not being able to play this back now with the Nvidia studio laptop if we’re not making use of that GPU magic even here at 1080 P.

Playback was going to play it’s going to buffer a little bit as you guys can see we start playing back damn we stopped there were dropping frames and even with an eight-core I. 9 CPU super powerful even at 1080 P.

It is not able to play it back right; this is where our TX 2070 comes. It will take this magic GPU button. What’s at play. While a lot, of course, that is a quarter. It’s rendering everything away ahead of time. This is for K.
No problem is still playing back without drop frames in the house rendering ahead of time and now the moment of truth.

Sets for resolution. Full 8 K. 25 frames per second live without dropping frames Russia rendering slightly faster with the queue ahead of it I cannot believe it, and this is what 2070, not the 2080 Max Q. we’re getting a full 8 K.

Playback full resolution, and this is with the let’s apply it, so this is the fourth grade as you can see we have a high image here. Let’s see that one more time without any proxies without transcoding on the fly and relatively inexpensive thin laptop-like.

This is the future of article editing harnessing the graphics in being able to do stuff like this, so thank you and article thank you for pushing the boundaries thank you read a read did release the windows API right.

Now anybody can download it, but this power into their programs, and be able to access all of that we are going to be testing a premiere pro, but they have not yet updated a premier.

This API that should be coming hopefully fairly soon here they’ve been making a lot of updates recently and starting to push the performance quite a bit if you guys saw my previous.

What article but even without the CPI that is incredible, we still have a ton of power in these R. T. X. graphics as you guys saw with the OpenCL test we have the 8 K.

The footage here hoppers Lucien’s or playing back at 14 now let’s go ahead and start it up I have dog years an evil that we could see what is going on it looks like.

We’re playing back about 2423 frames per second on the MacBook. We are playing at 9.5 frames per second. Hence, as you see, we’re mainly using the CPU and not that much of these powerful graphics, and as soon as the API gets integrated, that is going to flip. We can play this back out full resolution 8 K. now, the next thing I’m going to show you is going to blow.

Your guys as mine it blew my mind when I tested it out here we have 4.5 K. red rock now let’s explore. This project is where stuff got very interesting, and if we look at the system performance while we are doing that now, we’re getting about 76 percent G. P. usage 81 percent GPU usage so when we’re rendering.

We’re getting much more utilization of that graphics card than the timeline, and automatically, graphics are Max out the CPU is Max out. We have 4 minutes for 5 minutes a 4.5 Kate Redrock in just over 15 minutes with the MacBook pro.

This is crazy, so I am happy Nvidia created the studio laptop program where if somebody wants to pick something up, they don’t know a ton about systems. They know that if Nvidia certifies, the laptop is going to have perfect hardware.

It’s going to drivers are to be reliable, and you can pick it up and start using it without having to overthink it.

The system just grabs something that’s going to work, so thank you once again to Nvidia for working with me on this video, opening my eyes and seeing what is now possible.

I heard the announcement awhile back, and it kind of blew my mind was. Nice to see this hands-on and, of course.

I will have a link to both this MSI laptop down the script shin and Nvidia’s page because I want to find more information.

He gets Max a day I’ll be comparing the Sony A. 73 a super popular hybrid 4 K. camera in the Blackmagic pocket cinema camera 6 Katie that shoots raw against.

Then yes, my iPhone 11 pro-Max, this article is sponsored by Squarespace and all in 1 platform that makes it easy to make a fantastic website.

Before you, hardcore filmmakers go in the comments section and tell me that an iPhone isn’t a real article camera I need to process video by saying I’m not trying to see.

The whole you should not try to buy an iPhone instead of an actual you know video cameras like this where maybe this camera or the 4 K.

Version if you’re trying to become a filmmaker, but what I’m trying to do in this article is to see how far have smartphones come especially.

The newest iPhone apples leading the article game as far as phones and how they compete see what their strong points show you guys the weaknesses.

As well and NC can use an iPhone to shoot video many supplements something else, and if you’re starting a YouTube channel, you can’t afford an actual camera.

And lenses and all that stuff maybe can afford to upgrade from your iPhone 7 up to an iPhone 1180 and see can be used to shoot things like that, so that is what we’re going to take a look at now let’s start here comparing it to the 40 from the A. 73.

I have a freeze-frame here, and the most significant difference here is that the name of Grange now this is such an impressive look at the concrete we have more tightly detail with the iPhone in inside of the building we have so much more detail we’re not crushing the shadows.

It’s way brighter, and if I play this article, you guys will see that trend continues we look at the sky and look at all those clouds that are not their own all with the 873 and in this scenario exposed for the shadows.

We look at the difference in shadow and minute detail here. It is fantastic, and the same thing with this expose for the blind here looks at the sky.

Hi now, of course, I can you know pull down the highlights push of the shadows here but still the in the Sony cannot compete with the iPhone and here’s a shot with a 50 mill lands look how light the wood is in the sign is while maintaining those clouds and then if I push and pull the image yes, we can get a lot better from.

Sony is similar to the kind of S. log slightly worse, but it still will not compete now. I will explain how the iPhone is doing that here in just a second, but in these scenarios, you guys look at the sky.

There the iPhone and I excel and also with auto exposure and auto white balance he gets this year spot on where the so many blows out the tree and is way too cool now another area that I’ve been quite.

Impressed with the iPhone is the microphone quality that Sony is quite good as well, but you guys take a listen to the sample and let me know down the comments section which one you think is best. We.

No one downside of having this tremendous dynamic range is that everything just kind of looks flat in certain scenes because. It’s pushing everything together, especially when you don’t have the background blur that you can get with a hybrid camera or cinema camera everything.

Just doesn’t look as lovely you don’t have that same separation now both these cameras can shoot slow-motion this is both at 1080 P. 120 both of my look quite a bit worse than its 4 K. counterparts. Still, the iPhone has even more significant different benefits trying to push and pull the image too much, but it is a software artifact.

The wheels of the same thing with the Stoney, but it does look better than this next scene is here in the office with some studio lighting. And I’m trying to see can the iPhone be used to record YouTube videos. As I said earlier, if you can’t afford an actual camera, I’m now playing it.

I have to say I am just shocked and floored by how close this iPhone using its 50 Milan’s the telephoto lens which is where some quality to the Sony now yes it is not as good but saying I was not expecting this I try this out with the iPhone 10 as before. The results were much different compared to the A. 73 were here.

This you looks usable now fi punch and more yes the technology of the skin the colors are not as good we have more artifact Ingle bit less more noiseless detail. Still, wow I this is a 200 percent crop in a lot of people are watching on smartphones they’re streaming in 720 or even for 80 P.

If they’re, you know an unlimited plan at which a lot of limits you know to 480 P. and not case it’ll have an even smaller difference. I’m shocked now. I also looked at a little light. I think I push this a little bit too far. This is a 30 200 I sell, and I’ve almost terrible it looks a horrible lot of denoising so.

We lose a lot of detail we saw a lot of noise in the image where at 30 200 I sold a 73 looks super clean, and you can shoot at 30 200 I saw with pretty much no lights and, at an entirely usable image where you do not want to do that with the iPhone now before.

I move on and take a look at some awesome 6 K. footage to let me talk about something else that is awesome, and that is our sponsor Squarespace over the years I’ve made websites from scratch from custom templates.

I’ve tried multiple platforms in Squarespace. By far, my most recommended method no, I have been making websites with square space both for myself in other people for over five years now, and I’ve been choosing them because not only is it incredibly easy to make a website.

But you’ll have to be continually fixing problems or paying other people to take care of it. It just works and works well. That way, you can focus on what you love doing, whether you need a portfolio site E. commerce blog or anything else.

They’ve got you covered with great cross-platform designs to choose from and built-in SCO tools and security certificates, which make it a fantastic value had to squarespace.com slash Max urea for a no credit card required trial and if you sign up.

You’ll get 10 percent off your first purchase of a website or domain now let’s take a look at 6 K. footage, and I have to preface this by saying I’m not trying to get cinematic footage out of this in this scenario.

I did shoot black magic rock I do spend a lot of time greeting mainly what I was trying to see is we’re shooting with this camera shooting brought a lot of flexibility a lot more than with the Sony much better Kodak.

I’m Tracy can I match up the dynamic range that we saw previously with iPhone beat out the Sony. However, I can still maintain shadow detail and practical contrast limits even to have the right you know highlights, but before we look at that and before. I explain how the iPhone is doing such a great job; let’s first take a look at details; this is 6 K.

It’s detailed, and then I put the iPhone next to it, and once again, I want to say that I am pretty dang shocked now. Of course, I want to look as good but look way better.

Then I thought it wouldn’t we better than the previous iPhones or Samsung’s now if we punch, and we see clearly. That the six kids a lot more detail less artifact being anything like that too.

It’s not as huge of a difference as I expected previous phones would look terrible if you punch in you would never want to function. This looks fantastic but looks way better.

Than I expected, now we have this next scene where it’s not a super tricky dynamic range scene, but I did try to match up the contrast switching the maids you know pulling the shadows downs.

We have some true blacks and then not blowing out the sky or anything like that, so I got a pretty matched up here in this scene, of course, some of the colors are different but then.

When we go over to the left, we see that many shadows are crashed in that case where the iPhone is still able to maintain some of that detail and even though.

It’s not a crash in the shadows. We have more kind of contrast in the minutes, which is pretty impressive now. This is a reasonably easy seen self-reported this one here.

It’s more complicated we have this bridge a lot of kind of darker areas underneath the bridge I push and pull the raw image quite a bit here I want to beat the contrast and when I did that even though it’s not as good especially.

The trees look at the sky difference. It’s massive we have almost no color in the sky in detail in the clouds are pretty much gone even though.

They’re not blown out of course I could have pulled all of this down crushed the blacks pull down the shadows the meds a lot and then had a nice guy but with this raw image.

We’re dealing with just one frame, and what we’re doing is we’re just pushing and pulling, and you either have to choose your highlights or shadows now the way.

They’re able to achieve this is taking two images at different exposure levels and combining it, so it’ll take one at high shutter speed.

What low shutters beat when I saw the difference if your lower light and then it will combine not just like you’re doing each your photos so with that image like I said you have to push and pull and choose what you’re going to maintain but photographers for a.

Long time a done HDR retake two frames combine them, and then you can have excellent contrast shadow detail in highlights in the iPhone that is doing that on the fly. Not only will shooting 4030 issue 4 K. 62 exposures are blended but even if you’re hunting for K. 60, it will do for K. 120.

I took this a step further, and we went under this bridge. Here it’s super dark this like the darkest bridges wide covered at both ends, not a lot like getting into there, and the sun is just blaring outside ians the iPhone you look at how much detail.

We have in the minutes, and it’s not flat it looks bright, and we look outside we do have that sunspot but still.

We have better contrast with more brightness underneath the bridge because of that double exposure now, of course, I could have just crashed to the shadows a lot. That’s what you would do if you’re shooting a film some of those actual.

Cameras like the Lexus have quite a bit better dynamic range in this, but you would choose you to want your highlights or shadows you should do use different times of the day you add extra lighting but in this scenario.

I mean, how does exposure is excellent, and now we have this crazy scene that I thought was pretty poor because of how difficult this lighting situation is but still compared to the black magic.

Where I can expose in the middle, I really push and pull the image as much as I could I wanted to see myself see quite a bit of noise here, and I try this out with different I suppose in dementia resolve.

If I’m trying to see myself, I have to sacrifice the highlights in the back is bright. What I’ve looks terrible, but we get a lot more contrast and color while still seeing my face both look awful.

You wouldn’t want you in this way, but that’s what does exposure could do for you now, one issue with iPhones is if you have a scene like this first that standard lines with all that detail from the trees.

It just looks so crunchy and so bad now you can get around this by using filmic pro by using will say a lot profiler just recording without the extra sharpening and using a higher bit rate.

You could go about twice as high as with the standard camera app will do. They’ll help out.but in this scenario the black magic rock all that extra bit rate.and not you know not having over sharpening makes everything look natural and pleasing while still having detail no one area that the iPhone.

He excels with it, and I hope some of these cameras are implementing this image stabilization. So, not only has the lenses stabilized, but along with that, it’s using accelerometer and mapping the sheet that you have and then.

After you quit the video clip, not during it will process that use that data and give you a super steady image that looks like you’re almost shooting on a gamble compared to so much shake you know recording with the camera like this it doesn’t have I.

Best Worland stigmatization now there is an add on for these cameras called steady X. P. though use a similar thing has sensors and record that data and then also after with it knows precisely how much a stabilizer exactly how much she Q.

Had gives you great footage, but why not have added that into a camera like this where.

Later in the post, you have that extra data embedded into the file or maybe into a sidecar file, and then you can use that to stabilize.

The footage and not have the weird warping you get with work stabilizer or other stabilizers and have some excellent mood for the study so awesome to have. So there you go, guys, that is my comparison once again. I was trying to see where.

It where this camera where this phone excels and some of the weaknesses this is better than I expected.

When I was shooting us, I don’t think it’s going to do as well in a lot of these tests let me know your thoughts down in the comments section.

Hey, guys this Max a day we’re going to be comparing the new 16 inch MacBook pro this is a high-end model with the eight-core processor in the best graphics available to an R. T. X.

Studio lineup laptop has a piece of a graphics card inside and Nvidia 2070 Max Q. We’ll be seeing she does this crazy B.

So laptops moved an iMac pro what does apple have some tricks up its sleeve. I also only know that this article is sponsored by reading in this article. I’m going to look at premiere pro-intervention is off with a wide variety of code expand some different settings with some exciting results know also throw in final cut pro just in case.

You’re willing to go that route with the MacBook pro now just about a week ago before Apple updated the MacBook Pro to the new 16 inches the price difference would be more like maybe 7 to $800 come here too.

It’s about $250, that’s because the graphics cards are not only faster; they’re also cheaper. You get more storage from the base model now. You can’t get 64 gigabytes of memory on both of these.

The mac pro costs $400, and with the MSI, you can swap yourself for just about under $300 now one benefit for them a size you have a lot more ports on both sides, so that gives you more flexibility.

I don’t have any other ports other than four thunderbolts 3 is with the MacBook pro now a lot of people hate on the dongles. I personally rarely use dongles. I bought new cables for most of my accessories I have on one and a USB type C port on the other end of HDMI.

DisplayPort USB pretty much whatever else I need to suffer me that hasn’t been an issue now. Another significant difference between these two laptops is battery life. The site has an 82-hour battery. This is similar to what the mac pro used to have when apple updated to the new 16 inches. It now has a 100 watt-hour battery.

Which is the maximum that you can legally fly with into charge of these batteries the MSI has this crazy? Breaks 250 watts it’s a barrel plug whereas the MacBook pro has their list small little power adapter.

This new one has been made into a 96 what battery adapter slightly more substantial. However, it still is USB type C. To me, that is a huge benefit because I can use one of these inexpensive power banks to take my editing time for about 3:00 hours with this MacBook pro to about 6:00 hours the go.

Which is great for flights we’re driving somewhere or just being portable when you can’t get plugged in the M. S. I. in the testing that I did I got about an hour point 5 maybe an hour 45 minutes of editing you know takes more power has a smaller battery it’s less efficient. You can not run off a battery pack like this you can also buy a more expensive one.

Then I have and then literally not drain your internal battery at all and just run off the external when you’re editing. To me, that is a huge plus getting into performance running geekbench five multi-core tests the performance numbers are very close now technically.

The processor in this macro is ever so slightly faster. It’s a $200 add on. Still, I would not recommend it to anybody because of thermal limitations on both the systems, even amici, with three fans. You don’t gain anything from going for the 2.4 gigahertz over the 2.3.

This is why MSI probably uses the 2.3 I wish apple didn’t give us an option because it rips people off, but the real-world performance is the same now. Where the performance starts to differ dramatically is with the graphics between these two guys can see.

We have 28000 for the metal school workbench fives graphics test in 89000. This means that the graphics card inside the MSI laptop is about three times faster.

Then the best leaders graphics card that was just released in the crazy mac pro that thing is a beast, but it’s not—all rainbows and butterflies.

If I got the same correct it’s going to it’ll be interesting here. Before I show you the results I found and what you need to look out for, let me shout out to another great exciting product and that it is raining, I think the ring is the best holiday gift for yourself or anybody.

Who lives anywhere they need the doorbell I’ve been using it for a bit now, and it’s been amazing. I get a lot of packages. It’s lovely to get a live notification on my phone to tell them where to leave my bag for safekeeping, especially now for the holidays, the motion-sensing HD night vision camera.

I want to make sure there wasn’t anything wrong, so I triple checked my settings the Nvidia settings Intel settings the MSI settings the windows settings everything was set to maximum performance. This is what I was getting, so now let’s jump into.

Do article editing, and this is a five and a 4 K. project into premiere pro yeah it was slightly faster with the new MSI but not by that much and individuals all of it got a fair bit faster here 2 minutes and 7 seconds compared to 3 minutes and 2 seconds and then.

I didn’t want to unplug it, but I did it, and it said a taking 4 minutes of premier it took almost 14 and a set of taking just over 2 minutes.

We see almost 7 minutes the vast difference in performance, and there it is more than twice as slow as the MacBook pro keeps in mind the mac pro is continuously on the plug and not only that.

It’s rendering any you don’t make drop often and you can kind of wait for that, but we saw a difference in editing now the new MacBook pro this the first time that I’m seeing being able to add it at 30 frames per second for resolution 4 K. would too.

Let’s invoke an applied no job frames perfect smoothness in premiere pro with the latest updates 2020 version, and I’m aside doesn’t have any issue either. When you unplug if you’re editing on the go, we start to see dropped frames, so you have to lower down to at least a half-resolution to get smooth editing performance.

This is worrisome if you’re somebody that it’s on the go of course if you don’t if you’re always plugged in coffee shops somebody’s house not an issue but if you add on the airplane or other places we camp again this can be an issue, so I started digging around seeing wise.

Why do I see such a huge difference, and the graphics card 2070 in here in the same graphics card and other losses will perform similar it’s 115 wides rated graphics card a needs a ton of Jews to give you all that low power whereas the MacBook pro the whole laptop. If you turn on the screen brightness to 4 Max out the speakers the fans the CPU the GPU, it will not use more than 96 what’s I think kind of 94 is what it goes for.

Compared to just 115 for that graphics card, when you unplug it, the battery cannot give up enough power to power the graphics cards to cut that down significantly. It might be you know an actual cut down as far as battery life because if you give without full power.

The battery could even give it to you. You might get 20 minutes of editing, maybe 30, and your battery is utterly dead from 100 percent now. They get the least give you an hour point 5 in this will make a significant impact on all the guys. The number side by side from now on he doesn’t want to H. O. 265 video editing both laptops have no issue with this Kodak and surprisingly in premiere pro even though.

I don’t think great making use of the T. 2 chip the MacBook pro does a quite a faster job maybe 30 to 40 percent faster with amici plugged in the wall. When you unplug it, of course, editing smoothness goes down, and it takes almost three times longer than the MacBook pro to render now debentures Ulf.

We have similar results you for using the Intel chip to render, but do it yourself can make use of the Nvidia graphics card to give the article and then. We see a massive speed difference from 5 minutes and 10 seconds down to 1 minute and 50 seconds to render beating out the T. 2 chip.

The apple custom made for these MacBook pros so what I figured out is that if you are plugged in using the Nvidia NV NC, a renderer is quite a bit faster than quick sync with the CPU, but if you unplug because you don’t have all the Jews of the graphics card needs, you’re better off using quick sing. Hence, I tested everything both ways, and then I gave the fastest numbers for each, so all the untold numbers are faster using ready sync. That’s what I show in when you’re plugged in I show and B. and C.

Which is faster than causing some cases like this one massively faster now premiere pro will. Do not allow you to use this a lease with a third-party plugin, so there is all quick sync same thing with the MacBook pro.

This is a new graphics you do not have the option but with that said this new graphics card the new net 17 meter Navi graphics do have a similar high-end, high-speed rendering engine built-in, but none of the programs are yet using this now let’s move on to 10 bit H. I. 265 H. D. R.

The footage is a huge struggle for a final cut when exporting into ventures all instead of talking about an hour with the MacBook Pro, and it’s mainly using the CPU there. It took 1 minute and 25 seconds using the Nvidia NV E. and C.

My mind is blown now. I’m sure everything I set correctly for HDR if I’m doing something wrong in the seems way too crazy let me know because of the differences between an hour to a minute point 5 insane.

If we unplug the MSI, it gets closer to 5 to 6 minutes, but it is still so much better than 1 hour with the MacBook pro now with that said.

The new graphics in this Microprose does have much better 18 D. and coding hardware up to 4 K. 90 frames per second 10 bids, which will mean that. We pretty much will get about a minute point 5 once these programs start to utilize the hardware encoder, maybe about 2 minutes not as fast.

The graphics card will be able to do it even if you’re plugged out of the wall so I can not wait for the programs to be updated I think that’s what I’m going to start mastering my video files in H. E. R. instead because at this point.

It just takes way too long, and I’m not willing to put up with that now let’s get into the tougher Kotak starting with C. 200 rock in premiere pro we get a notice a little boost here. That is nice, but nothing like we get into injuries all week from over 14 minutes to under 6 minutes.

When you are unplugged, so there you guys have it as far as how the performance is very similar between the two laptops if they are plugged in when you unplug you take a noticeable hit us so there we have a guy.

What is my main take away from this, yes this MSI laptop is an absolute beast the graphics card is a beast, but you need to feed the animal for the creature to be happy, and that the render speeds don’t matter that much yes you can wait to you know have to render the often.

What matters is when you’re editing, you go from smooth experience to experience that is much worse than the MacBook Pro that is you know weaker overall in that case. You might buy a MacBook pro even if you don’t use the final cut. You’re using premiere pro adventures all.

He’ll get better editing battery life about double, and you have a bit of an excellent move their experience when you’re plugged in yes you’re entering is going to be slower. However, it’s still reasonably fast with Lee as updates about three times.

Faster than just a year ago but now it is going to be excellent no matter where you’re at or what you’re doing so I was not expecting the difference to be that big, so that is kind of what I learned to let me know your guy’s thoughts down in the video comments section L.

Have some links in the description once again thanks to ring for sponsoring this article guys he made it this far in the video I’ll just say I seriously love my bracelet I wish I got one.

I don’t know as early as I heard about it. I don’t think I need one, but once you get it, the conveniences are just huge, and you’ll be grateful to have one, so thank you guys for watching I will see you in the next article.

Max the day we’re going to take a look at the new 2019 mac pro, and we’re going to see how it performs in video editing now I have to say that this thing is an absolute beast. The build quality is fantastic. I love the design.

It is incredibly silent, shockingly silent, and even the case that it comes in the box with like 30 pounds for the sporty pound machine. I need apple to do a great job now. It is also incredibly expensive not saying it’s worth it to a particular group of people, I think.

It is, but there’s a lot of other options that we’re going to see for a different video, so today I’m going to focus on final cut pro. I think a lot of people will buy the system for a final cut that’s a mac OS exclusive. Of course, some of you guys are going to use premiere or damage results. Still, I want to get this initial article out there as soon.

I can I know you guys are excited you guys want to see how it does and my full in-depth test we’re going to look at the pictures all premiere pro and final cut a lot of different codecs and make some comparisons that. Are going to be out shortly in the future that does take multiple days of testing in the shooting and editing, so make sure you guys are subscribed because don’t miss out on that article.

But I have a lot of great info for you guys now we also did a video taken a look at the thermal performance and a ton of different benchmarks 3 D. animation graphics performance. Some gaming-type stuff that’s over on the Max said channel I’ll leave a link down in the description.

There are some exciting things in a couple of ways that the system stands out apart from like other workstation computers, so let’s jump right in and talk about the configuration here. I already did a video on what configs I recommend for most people. You can check that out.

But I have the 12 core model at 3.3 gigahertz. This has 48 gigabytes of ram in this house read the radio pro Vega 2 graphics card with 32 gigabytes of HBM 2 memory, and that’s what’s going to be very important for video editing.

I also have the afterburner card in the system that’s going to able decoding. Programs and programs Russell we’re going to put that to the test today as well. That’s the option that I don’t know how much people need to spend.

If you work a lot of people maybe but we shall see. The 1 test I don’t want to run for you guys a black magic rock crew is the black magic recipe test here we could see right away we’re running EKG decoding it out 114 frames per second and that’s getting close about four streams of Multicam 8 K. and if we take a look at 4 K.

We have 400 and 59 frames per second, so that’s close to 20 streams of 4 K. multi camp black magic rock. I also want to give you guys a reference point of performance for the system, even though. I don’t want to get into benchmarks as far as CPU performance. This thing is getting about 50 to 55 percent more CPU performance then R. I. mac pro, which has an eight-core CPU clock speed, is also running higher.

Which is excellent, and as far as graphics in geekbench fives metal square, this thing was about 85 percent faster, but we shall see how it performs an actual video editing.

First, let me give a huge thanks to the microcenter for making our mac pro content possible microcenter has 25 stores. Nationwide with an impressive variety of electronics from gaming VR computer parts like processors graphics and everything else needed to build or upgrade a PC or mac microcenter has been an apple authorized dealer since 1980.

They have a dedicated apple department with highly trained apple sales associates. Aside from the iPhone, a microcenter carries the full lineup of Apple products and has the largest selection of third-party products, and accessories for mac and iPad come into a local microcenter.

Today and talk to 1 of their apple experts to order iMac pro configurations that best suit your needs check. The link in the description to find a location near you or browse all of micro centers apple products online let’s start with the easy stuff. This is footage from the A. 7 S. 2.

We do have some color corrections of 2 lots applied to this and feel great as well. Playing it back, this is at best quality no issues whatsoever; in fact, our CPUs only running at 2 percent. A graphics is running it was just 6 percent would back went 9 percent right now I’m exporting this 5-minute project we’re up to 6 percent CPU usage and 19 percent graphics card usage so here we could see that this system is overkill if you’re editing with standard 4 K.

Compressed H. I. 2644 H. or X. H. I. 265 took 2 minutes and 31 seconds for a 5-minute project twice as fast as real-time, so that’s not a big difference. But I’m not pro also isn’t limited by graphics or by the CPU is just limited by the encoder in the graphics card the older generations so here both systems have a straightforward time in the MacBook Pro isn’t that much lower either.

It’s good to see that this new AMD graphics is faster we do see some improvement because with those guys that don’t know back in 2013 the last mac pro is quite a bit slower than the MacBook Pro and I back when you’re exporting this type of simple.

It’s good to see these new graphics cards. You’re no longer slower at exporting even if you could edit faster now. Let’s do a similar test with H. I. 265 HEVC this will use the T. 2 chip that’s inside. The system, and just as I expected, the time is the same as the iMac pro because they’re both using the same T. 2 chip.

The rest of the components have no issues with this footage now let’s jump into its head bit H. D. is playing this back there are no issues whatsoever everything’s perfectly smooth. I have a couple of lots here were still at 4 percent CPU 8 percent GPU not back to 2 percent CPU no issues at all whatsoever but the issue.

That people are having is when you’re trying to export this because with the previous machines, there’s no acceleration for the exporting has. To be CPU only took the new graphics card forever in the new MacBook pros 60-inch ones in this system have a 10 bit it colder.

I don’t know if I look at is using it yet it might still be software so let’s take a look all right, so that’s 35 minutes which is a long time for a 5-minute project that is not an issue with the system at all it’s an issue with a final cut at the I’m not project X. 45 minutes, so we do see some improvement.

There but this system was even using half of the C. P. U. ultimately, we need for Apple to release version 15 of the final cut for HDR HEVC 10 bit exporting with the graphics card.

Because a project like this should take somewhere between 2 to 3 minutes to export now, let’s get into the harder tougher stuff here. I have 4 K. 60 frames per second footage from the canon C. 200. This is raw footage. Some corrections applied.

I have a lot of play here as I expected and as it should for this amount of money it is playing back perfectly smoothly the graphics card is running at 67 percent. The CPUs running at 27 percent so no issues whatsoever playing this back on other system say as the mac pro would Max out the graphics card.

If you add more corrections in a fax in titles in this, you will get some choppiness some stuttering it. It’s Max out at 60 FPS was here you should be able to do multi-cam 2430 FPS C. 200 Rossi 3 streams of it exciting, so we’re exporting this. I’m used to seeing the CPU the graphics card be maxed out with this footage in here our graphics card is running at 67 percent as well and our CPUs running at 28 percent this is the 12 core configuration.

This is weird. I’ve never seen this not be maxed out, so for the first time, 4 K. 60 C. 200 rod is not the limitation is the income. The order that took 5 minutes for a 5-minute project in comparison I’m not pro takes closer to 8 minutes, so that is a pretty significant improvement, but not just that alone the CBN graphics are maxed out.

The where the I mac pro is maxing out in its limit at that speed this has way more overhead if you want to do multi-cam if you’re going to affect more animations harder stuff more and I’ll still do 5 minutes.

Because right now the limiter is the encoder we’re just taking it one to one that is good news for those guys who work with the Sportage if you’re exporting a 20-minute doc you know you might be able to ship it in 10 to 15 minutes if it’s 24 or 30 frames per second not bad at all.

So we’ll take a look at that a bit more in my full detailed video and now seek a look at red rock this is 4.5 Kate playing it back perfectly smoothly CPUs at 76 percent right now 58 dropdowns.

The jeep you kicked up to help out now so bounce that out 25 percent on the graphics no issues what so ever and now I do want to say once again that Apple is going to release and dreads new metal API.

Whatsoever that fast here’s the afterburner card this is worth $2000, let’s set it down carefully right over here start playing this same back project now at the Cebu has about 21 percent usage.

The graphics card is still about the same took off 20 percent of C. P. usage running this, and everything was processed here instead of a not went up slightly. Let’s try to go back and forth super smooth still.

I mean, it has no issues, and this is why I was saying in my configuration guide that hold off from buying the afterburner card one make sure we tested out because the CD is already so dominant in the system. Programs rise so efficiently with the final cut.

Then you might not need it. You might have enough horsepower even with the 12 core possibly even eight courts which also leave the twelfth okay so the renders about halfway done here. We’re ready almost on a minute 45 seconds, so the afterburner cart is helping it took 2 minutes and 52 seconds that is fascinating interesting so.

I guess I’ll have to do a lot more testing on the afterburner card different plea back enough to for. Fines of 8 K. ProRes raw footage if you guys have some, please let me know in the comments section.

That way, I can test it out with that and give you guys a better verdict on if it’s worth it or if it’s not, so that is it guys let me know your thoughts down in the comments section below what. They got to point out is that this thing was completely silent the whole time I literally cannot hear it unless my ears like an inch away and even.

Then it’s so subtle quiet it is shocking. We pushed it in our other video, Max, if you sell it to the limits, we Max out the CPU and the GPU at the same time for an extended period I’ll just let you watch that video at the link is down below so thanks again to microcenter for making.