16″ MacBook Pro vs BEAST PC Laptop for Editing?

    16" MacBook Pro vs BEAST PC Laptop for Editing?

    Hey, guys this Max a day we’re going to be comparing the new 16 inch MacBook pro this is a high-end model with the eight-core processor in the best graphics available to an R. T. X.

    Studio lineup laptop has a piece of a graphics card inside and Nvidia 2070 Max Q. We’ll be seeing she does this crazy B.

    So laptops moved an iMac pro what does apple have some tricks up its sleeve. I also only know that this article is sponsored by reading in this article. I’m going to look at premiere pro-intervention is off with a wide variety of code expand some different settings with some exciting results know also throw in final cut pro just in case.

    You’re willing to go that route with the MacBook pro now just about a week ago before Apple updated the MacBook Pro to the new 16 inches the price difference would be more like maybe 7 to $800 come here too.

    It’s about $250, that’s because the graphics cards are not only faster; they’re also cheaper. You get more storage from the base model now. You can’t get 64 gigabytes of memory on both of these.

    The mac pro costs $400, and with the MSI, you can swap yourself for just about under $300 now one benefit for them a size you have a lot more ports on both sides, so that gives you more flexibility.

    I don’t have any other ports other than four thunderbolts 3 is with the MacBook pro now a lot of people hate on the dongles. I personally rarely use dongles. I bought new cables for most of my accessories I have on one and a USB type C port on the other end of HDMI.

    DisplayPort USB pretty much whatever else I need to suffer me that hasn’t been an issue now. Another significant difference between these two laptops is battery life. The site has an 82-hour battery. This is similar to what the mac pro used to have when apple updated to the new 16 inches. It now has a 100 watt-hour battery.

    Which is the maximum that you can legally fly with into charge of these batteries the MSI has this crazy? Breaks 250 watts it’s a barrel plug whereas the MacBook pro has their list small little power adapter.

    This new one has been made into a 96 what battery adapter slightly more substantial. However, it still is USB type C. To me, that is a huge benefit because I can use one of these inexpensive power banks to take my editing time for about 3:00 hours with this MacBook pro to about 6:00 hours the go.

    Which is great for flights we’re driving somewhere or just being portable when you can’t get plugged in the M. S. I. in the testing that I did I got about an hour point 5 maybe an hour 45 minutes of editing you know takes more power has a smaller battery it’s less efficient. You can not run off a battery pack like this you can also buy a more expensive one.

    Then I have and then literally not drain your internal battery at all and just run off the external when you’re editing. To me, that is a huge plus getting into performance running geekbench five multi-core tests the performance numbers are very close now technically.

    The processor in this macro is ever so slightly faster. It’s a $200 add on. Still, I would not recommend it to anybody because of thermal limitations on both the systems, even amici, with three fans. You don’t gain anything from going for the 2.4 gigahertz over the 2.3.

    This is why MSI probably uses the 2.3 I wish apple didn’t give us an option because it rips people off, but the real-world performance is the same now. Where the performance starts to differ dramatically is with the graphics between these two guys can see.

    We have 28000 for the metal school workbench fives graphics test in 89000. This means that the graphics card inside the MSI laptop is about three times faster.

    Then the best leaders graphics card that was just released in the crazy mac pro that thing is a beast, but it’s not—all rainbows and butterflies.

    If I got the same correct it’s going to it’ll be interesting here. Before I show you the results I found and what you need to look out for, let me shout out to another great exciting product and that it is raining, I think the ring is the best holiday gift for yourself or anybody.

    Who lives anywhere they need the doorbell I’ve been using it for a bit now, and it’s been amazing. I get a lot of packages. It’s lovely to get a live notification on my phone to tell them where to leave my bag for safekeeping, especially now for the holidays, the motion-sensing HD night vision camera.

    I want to make sure there wasn’t anything wrong, so I triple checked my settings the Nvidia settings Intel settings the MSI settings the windows settings everything was set to maximum performance. This is what I was getting, so now let’s jump into.

    Do article editing, and this is a five and a 4 K. project into premiere pro yeah it was slightly faster with the new MSI but not by that much and individuals all of it got a fair bit faster here 2 minutes and 7 seconds compared to 3 minutes and 2 seconds and then.

    I didn’t want to unplug it, but I did it, and it said a taking 4 minutes of premier it took almost 14 and a set of taking just over 2 minutes.

    We see almost 7 minutes the vast difference in performance, and there it is more than twice as slow as the MacBook pro keeps in mind the mac pro is continuously on the plug and not only that.

    It’s rendering any you don’t make drop often and you can kind of wait for that, but we saw a difference in editing now the new MacBook pro this the first time that I’m seeing being able to add it at 30 frames per second for resolution 4 K. would too.

    Let’s invoke an applied no job frames perfect smoothness in premiere pro with the latest updates 2020 version, and I’m aside doesn’t have any issue either. When you unplug if you’re editing on the go, we start to see dropped frames, so you have to lower down to at least a half-resolution to get smooth editing performance.

    This is worrisome if you’re somebody that it’s on the go of course if you don’t if you’re always plugged in coffee shops somebody’s house not an issue but if you add on the airplane or other places we camp again this can be an issue, so I started digging around seeing wise.

    Why do I see such a huge difference, and the graphics card 2070 in here in the same graphics card and other losses will perform similar it’s 115 wides rated graphics card a needs a ton of Jews to give you all that low power whereas the MacBook pro the whole laptop. If you turn on the screen brightness to 4 Max out the speakers the fans the CPU the GPU, it will not use more than 96 what’s I think kind of 94 is what it goes for.

    Compared to just 115 for that graphics card, when you unplug it, the battery cannot give up enough power to power the graphics cards to cut that down significantly. It might be you know an actual cut down as far as battery life because if you give without full power.

    The battery could even give it to you. You might get 20 minutes of editing, maybe 30, and your battery is utterly dead from 100 percent now. They get the least give you an hour point 5 in this will make a significant impact on all the guys. The number side by side from now on he doesn’t want to H. O. 265 video editing both laptops have no issue with this Kodak and surprisingly in premiere pro even though.

    I don’t think great making use of the T. 2 chip the MacBook pro does a quite a faster job maybe 30 to 40 percent faster with amici plugged in the wall. When you unplug it, of course, editing smoothness goes down, and it takes almost three times longer than the MacBook pro to render now debentures Ulf.

    We have similar results you for using the Intel chip to render, but do it yourself can make use of the Nvidia graphics card to give the article and then. We see a massive speed difference from 5 minutes and 10 seconds down to 1 minute and 50 seconds to render beating out the T. 2 chip.

    The apple custom made for these MacBook pros so what I figured out is that if you are plugged in using the Nvidia NV NC, a renderer is quite a bit faster than quick sync with the CPU, but if you unplug because you don’t have all the Jews of the graphics card needs, you’re better off using quick sing. Hence, I tested everything both ways, and then I gave the fastest numbers for each, so all the untold numbers are faster using ready sync. That’s what I show in when you’re plugged in I show and B. and C.

    Which is faster than causing some cases like this one massively faster now premiere pro will. Do not allow you to use this a lease with a third-party plugin, so there is all quick sync same thing with the MacBook pro.

    This is a new graphics you do not have the option but with that said this new graphics card the new net 17 meter Navi graphics do have a similar high-end, high-speed rendering engine built-in, but none of the programs are yet using this now let’s move on to 10 bit H. I. 265 H. D. R.

    The footage is a huge struggle for a final cut when exporting into ventures all instead of talking about an hour with the MacBook Pro, and it’s mainly using the CPU there. It took 1 minute and 25 seconds using the Nvidia NV E. and C.

    My mind is blown now. I’m sure everything I set correctly for HDR if I’m doing something wrong in the seems way too crazy let me know because of the differences between an hour to a minute point 5 insane.

    If we unplug the MSI, it gets closer to 5 to 6 minutes, but it is still so much better than 1 hour with the MacBook pro now with that said.

    The new graphics in this Microprose does have much better 18 D. and coding hardware up to 4 K. 90 frames per second 10 bids, which will mean that. We pretty much will get about a minute point 5 once these programs start to utilize the hardware encoder, maybe about 2 minutes not as fast.

    The graphics card will be able to do it even if you’re plugged out of the wall so I can not wait for the programs to be updated I think that’s what I’m going to start mastering my video files in H. E. R. instead because at this point.

    It just takes way too long, and I’m not willing to put up with that now let’s get into the tougher Kotak starting with C. 200 rock in premiere pro we get a notice a little boost here. That is nice, but nothing like we get into injuries all week from over 14 minutes to under 6 minutes.

    When you are unplugged, so there you guys have it as far as how the performance is very similar between the two laptops if they are plugged in when you unplug you take a noticeable hit us so there we have a guy.

    What is my main take away from this, yes this MSI laptop is an absolute beast the graphics card is a beast, but you need to feed the animal for the creature to be happy, and that the render speeds don’t matter that much yes you can wait to you know have to render the often.

    What matters is when you’re editing, you go from smooth experience to experience that is much worse than the MacBook Pro that is you know weaker overall in that case. You might buy a MacBook pro even if you don’t use the final cut. You’re using premiere pro adventures all.

    He’ll get better editing battery life about double, and you have a bit of an excellent move their experience when you’re plugged in yes you’re entering is going to be slower. However, it’s still reasonably fast with Lee as updates about three times.

    Faster than just a year ago but now it is going to be excellent no matter where you’re at or what you’re doing so I was not expecting the difference to be that big, so that is kind of what I learned to let me know your guy’s thoughts down in the video comments section L.

    Have some links in the description once again thanks to ring for sponsoring this article guys he made it this far in the video I’ll just say I seriously love my bracelet I wish I got one.

    I don’t know as early as I heard about it. I don’t think I need one, but once you get it, the conveniences are just huge, and you’ll be grateful to have one, so thank you guys for watching I will see you in the next article.


    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here